Here are the leading AI recruiting platforms that support voice/audio interviews (automated phone or browser voice interviews, transcription, AI summaries/scoring or live-assist). Short notes on what each does best and one-sentence caveat — with sources so you can check features and pricing.

Top AI voice-interview tools

• Talkpush (Sam / Voice‑AI) — Best for high-volume, multilingual automated voice screening and AI phone interviews. Offers an AI voice agent that can call, hold real‑time voice interviews, transcribe, score and integrate with ATS workflows. Caveat: built for scale; pricing typically volume-based. (talkpush.com)

• Talkpush / HireVox–style emerging voice-AI vendors (HireVox and similar new entrants) — Many newer vendors provide fully automated outbound voice screening that calls candidates, conducts role-specific voice interviews and generates fit reports; good for SMBs needing quick voice-first screening. Caveat: newer vendors often have limited public reviews—validate with a demo/pilot. (alternativeto.net)

• Humanly — Good for automating candidate engagement across chat, voice and video; supports voice/video screening with configurable knockouts and ATS integrations. Good balance of candidate experience + automation. (humanly.io)

• Talkpush / Paradox (Olivia) — Paradox’s Olivia is strong at conversational screening and scheduling and supports recorded audio/video responses inside the conversational flow; excellent if you need automation + robust scheduling/hand‑off to humans. (paradox.ai)

• HireVue / Modern Hire — Enterprise-grade platform with automated interview scoring, multilingual audio/video support and a long track record in large-scale assessments (note: HireVue removed controversial facial analysis previously and emphasizes language/speech-based assessments now). Good for enterprises that need validated, science‑backed scoring. Caveat: strong compliance scrutiny — review documentation and disclosures. (hirevue.com)

• Talview — Offers AI-driven voice/video interviews, behavioral insights (NLP + tone analysis) and candidate verification; built for enterprise and high‑volume situations. Caveat: includes proctoring/authentication features that may require candidate disclosure. (talview.com)

• Willo — Lightweight, candidate-friendly platform that supports audio-only or video responses, automatic transcription, AI summaries and AI checks (scripted/AI-generated detection). Good for small-to-mid teams wanting a simple async audio option. (willo.video)

• Vervoe — Skills- and assessment-first platform that supports audio responses in assessments; focuses on content/skills rather than voice/facial profiling (they state they do not use voice or facial analysis for hiring decisions). Good when you want to evaluate skills with occasional audio questions without voice‑analysis bias concerns. (help.vervoe.com)

• X0PA AI (ROOM / Zeus) — Enterprise interviewing assistant that can join live interviews to transcribe, extract highlights and provide interview intelligence; supports audio/video and language coverage. Good for analytics-centric enterprises. (appsource.microsoft.com)

• Interviewstream / Tradiational vendors (Interview Connect) — Longstanding video/voice interview platforms with added AI helpers (transcripts, question generation and review tools). Good for organizations wanting mature, stable vendors and compliance features (SOC2/GDPR). (interviewstream.com)

How to choose — quick checklist

• Candidate experience: pick voice-first tools (Talkpush, Willo, Humanly) if you want phone‑style interviews and higher completion rates. (help.talkpush.com)
• Scale & automation: choose Talkpush, Paradox, HireVox-style voice bots for very high volumes. (talkpush.com)
• Enterprise/validated science: HireVue/Modern Hire, Talview, X0PA for mature assessment science, multilingual support and security/compliance. (hirevue.com)
• Ethical/bias concerns: prefer vendors that document their AI approach, provide opt‑outs or only analyze content (not faces/voice biomarkers) — e.g., Vervoe’s content-only stance and HireVue/Modern Hire’s public changes on facial analysis. Always require vendor documentation and audits. (help.vervoe.com)
• Integrations & workflow: if you need scheduling + live handoff, Paradox (Olivia) or ATS-friendly platforms are best. (paradox.ai)

Operational cautions (must-read)

• Disclosure & consent: many jurisdictions and corporate policies require you tell candidates when AI is used and what it analyzes — confirm vendor disclosure options. (talkpush.com)
• Bias & legal risk: voice/tonality analysis is still controversial and can produce disparate impact; prefer content/NLP-based evaluation or audited models and maintain human-in-the-loop. (shrm.org)
• Anti‑cheat / authenticity: if you rely on automated interviews, look for anti‑cheat/AI‑generated-response detection and candidate verification features (Willo, Talview, Talkpush offer these). (support.willo.video)

If you want a 1–2 line recommendation for a specific hiring scenario (enterprise vs. SMB vs. hourly/high-volume vs. skills-based), tell me which one and I’ll pick the top 2 options and an implementation checklist (pilot size, disclosure text to give candidates, and sample KPI to track).