The analysis on this page is derived from AI platform responses, providing a detailed view of brand visibility and positioning

Steps to develop an AI agent platform

Prompt

Last updated 12th September 2025

Domain count
medium.com
11
aalpha.net
9
q3tech.com
8
Citations count
25
0
15
10
Brands Discovered
20
15
0
6

Original answer

Below is a practical, end-to-end checklist and phased plan you can follow to design, build, test, and operate an AI agent platform (agents = autonomous or semi-autonomous systems that perceive, reason, act, and interact using models and external tools).

PHASE 0 — Strategy & requirements (discovery)

  • Define purpose & users
    • Primary use cases (customer support, research assistant, automation, orchestration, RPA, sales, internal knowledge, etc.)
    • Success criteria (KPIs: task completion rate, user satisfaction, latency, cost-per-task)
    • Security/compliance constraints (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, internal IP rules)
  • Scope & constraints
    • Which domains, languages, data sensitivity, throughput targets
    • Decide allowed actions (read-only, write, exec tools, make calls)
  • Stakeholders & team
    • Product manager, ML engineer, infra/DevOps, frontend/backend, data engineer, security/compliance, QA, UX
  • Risk assessment
    • Safety/hallucinations, data leaks, adversarial inputs, malicious automation

PHASE 1 — Architecture & design

  • Conceptual architecture components
    • Client (UI/CLI/API)
    • Orchestrator / Agent runtime (manages agent loops, tool interfaces, policies)
    • Models (LLMs, smaller specialist models)
    • Retrieval & memory (vector DB / knowledge store)
    • Tools & connectors (APIs, databases, search, browser automation, RPA)
    • State & session store (Redis/DB for conversation state, action history, memory)
    • Audit & logging (immutable action logs)
    • Monitoring & observability (metrics, logs, traces)
    • Security & governance layer (authN, authZ, policy engine)
  • High-level decisions
    • Hosted models vs self-hosted open-source models (latency, cost, control)
    • Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) vs prompt-only
    • Centralized vs distributed orchestration (microservices, event-driven)
  • Data model & schemas
    • Session, observation, action, tool-result, memory item schema
    • Audit record format (timestamp, user, prompt, model response, action, tool input/output)

PHASE 2 — Prototyping (fast feedback)

  • Minimal viable prototype (MVP) goals
    • End-to-end loop from user input → agent reasoning → tool call → response
    • One or two high-value tools (e.g., knowledge search and a single write action)
  • Build tasks
    • Implement a simple orchestrator that:
      • Encodes prompt + context
      • Calls LLM
      • Parses model output to “action” when required
      • Executes tool and feeds back results
    • Implement retrieval pipeline: ingest a small knowledge set, create embeddings, simple retrieval
    • Add session state & a memory API
  • Validation
    • Manual testing of common flows and failure modes
    • Measure latency and cost per request
  • Tools/libraries to accelerate
    • Use agent frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex, or similar) for prototypes or build a lightweight custom orchestrator if you need control

PHASE 3 — Build core platform

  • Core services
    • Agent Orchestrator
      • Manage agent state, multi-step plans, tool invocation, backoff/retry logic
      • Support synchronous and asynchronous actions
    • Tool/Connector Layer
      • Standardized tool contract (name, inputs, outputs, auth)
      • Sandbox for untrusted tools or external code execution
    • Retrieval & Memory
      • Vector DB (Pinecone, Qdrant, Milvus, Weaviate) or self-hosted alternatives
      • Memory strategy: short-term vs long-term, summarization, TTL, forgetting policies
    • Model Manager
      • Provider abstractions (multiple vendors + self-hosted)
      • Model selection: routing by task, cost/latency policies, A/B tests
    • Security / Policy Engine
      • Role-based access, allow/deny table for tools/actions, content filters, safety checks
    • Observability & Analytics
      • Metrics (latency, success rate, hallucination rate, cost), traces, dashboards
    • CI/CD & Deployment
      • Containerization (Docker), orchestration (Kubernetes), blue/green or canary deploys
  • Infrastructure & scaling
    • Use autoscaling for workers; separate CPU/GPU workloads
    • Caching (response caching, embeddings cache)
    • Message queues for async work (Kafka, RabbitMQ)
    • Rate limiting and circuit breakers for external tools and model providers

PHASE 4 — Testing, safety, & compliance

  • Unit & integration tests (including tool mocks)
  • Scenario-based tests & test suites (happy path + edge cases)
  • Red-team & adversarial testing
    • Attempt to induce hallucinations, data exfiltration, privilege escalation
  • Safety layers
    • Output filters, instruction-following checks, toxic content filters
    • Action authorization: require human approval for sensitive actions
  • Privacy & compliance
    • PII detection/redaction, encryption at rest/in transit, data retention policies
    • Data subject-request handling and audit logs

PHASE 5 — Deployment & rollout

  • Staged rollout
    • Internal beta → limited user beta → gradual public rollout
  • Monitoring in production
    • Track model performance drift, user success, cost, latency, error rates
    • Alerts for anomalous behavior or policy violations
  • Observability
    • Dashboards (Grafana), logs (ELK/Opensearch), traces (Jaeger/Zipkin)
  • Feedback loops
    • Logging user corrections / feedback for supervised fine-tuning or prompt improvements
  • Continuous evaluation & retraining
    • Periodic data sampling, labeling, retraining or prompt adjustments

PHASE 6 — Operate & iterate

  • SLOs & incident response
    • Define SLOs (availability, latency percentiles)
    • Runbooks for model outages and bad agent behaviors
  • Model governance
    • Model registry, model cards, versioning of prompts and policies
  • Cost management
    • Monitor token usage, tool calls, optimized model selection, batching
  • Feature roadmap
    • Add toolset, multi-agent coordination, more languages, specialized models

IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS / PRACTICAL ITEMS

  • Agent loop (pseudocode)
    • initialize session state
    • while not done and steps < max:
      • observe = collect_user_input + context + memory + tool_outputs
      • prompt = build_prompt(observe)
      • model_out = call_model(prompt)
      • parse model_out into either (respond to user) or (plan -> tool call)
      • if tool call:
        • authorize tool
        • call tool
        • store tool result
      • update memory/session
    • return final response
  • Prompting & plan parsing
    • Use structured responses (JSON/plan format) or function-calling APIs where available
    • Validate outputs with schema validators
  • Retrieval & memory patterns
    • Chunk large docs, create embedding per chunk
    • Use relevance + recency scoring
    • Summarize past interactions to keep context size small
  • Tools & connectors
    • Define a standard Tool interface: {id, name, description, inputs_schema, outputs_schema, auth}
    • Use a sandbox for any tool that executes code or affects external systems
  • Model selection strategy
    • Cheap model for routine Q/A, larger (or multimodal) model for complex planning
    • A/B test model choices and routing policies
  • Data pipeline & versioning
    • Store raw + processed data, embeddings, labeled feedback
    • Version data and prompts (Git + DVC or similar)
  • Security
    • End-to-end encryption for sensitive channels
    • Least privilege for tool credentials; rotate keys
    • Policy engine to block dangerous actions (finance execution, destructive operations) unless approved
  • Metrics to track
    • Business: task success rate, user satisfaction (NPS), retention
    • System: latency p50/p95/p99, throughput, error rate, cost per task
    • Safety: hallucination rate, policy violations, false positives/negatives in filters

MVP feature list (example)

  • User authentication + sessions
  • Natural-language input → model response
  • Retrieval from knowledge base (vector search)
  • One write-action tool (e.g., create ticket or send email) with confirmations
  • Audit logs & basic rate limiting
  • Admin UI for monitoring & tool configuration

SAMPLE API endpoints (design sketch)

  • POST /api/v1/sessions — start session
  • POST /api/v1/sessions/{id}/messages — send user message, returns agent reply
  • GET /api/v1/sessions/{id}/state — session state & memory summary
  • POST /api/v1/tools — register a tool (admin)
  • POST /api/v1/agents/run — start a named agent workflow (server-to-server)
  • GET /api/v1/metrics — usage/alerts (admin)

TIMELINE (very approximate)

  • Discovery & design: 2–4 weeks
  • Prototype (single use case): 3–8 weeks
  • MVP (production-ready core with basic scale): 8–16 weeks
  • Production maturity (governance, scale, multi-tool): 3–6+ months

RISKS & MITIGATIONS

  • Hallucination / wrong actions
    • Mitigate: RAG + citations, allow human approval for critical actions, output validation
  • Data leakage
    • Mitigate: PII detection, redaction, strict access controls, separate environments
  • Cost runaway
    • Mitigate: budgets, rate limits, cheaper model fallback, batching, token limits
  • Latency / scale issues
    • Mitigate: caching, model routing, async workflows, autoscaling

Operational checklist before go-live

  • End-to-end tests pass
  • Safety & red-team assessment completed
  • Logging, tracing, and alerting in place
  • Access control & secrets management configured
  • Data retention & deletion policies implemented
  • Runbook & incident response ready

Next-step quick action plan (first 30 days)

  1. Finalize primary use case and success metrics.
  2. Design session/state schema and minimal tool interface.
  3. Build a one-flow prototype (user query → model → one tool → response).
  4. Add retrieval (small dataset) and basic logging.
  5. Run internal user testing and collect feedback for MVP planning.

If you want, I can:

  • Produce a concrete architecture diagram and component list for your specific use case.
  • Draft example JSON schemas for session/memory/tool contracts.
  • Provide a starter repo structure and sample code (orchestrator pseudocode / LangChain-like example).

Which of those would you like me to generate now?

Join BrandRadar to track your LLM score

Stay ahead of the curve. Get insights, benchmarks, and personalized alerts on your brand's LLM performance.

Rank
Brand
Topic
LLM
Sentiment
1
🥇

LangChain

53%
85%
75%
0%
Neutral
2
🥈

Lindy

28%
0%
85%
0%
Neutral
3
🥉

LlamaIndex

27%
80%
0%
0%
Neutral
4

Rivet

27%
0%
80%
0%
Neutral
5

Pinecone

25%
75%
0%
0%
Neutral
6

Qdrant

23%
70%
0%
0%
Neutral
7

React

23%
0%
70%
0%
Neutral
8

Milvus

22%
65%
0%
0%
Neutral
9

GPT

22%
0%
65%
0%
Neutral
10

Weaviate

20%
60%
0%
0%
Neutral
11

BERT

20%
0%
60%
0%
Neutral
12

Kafka

18%
55%
0%
0%
Neutral
13

RabbitMQ

17%
50%
0%
0%
Neutral
14

Grafana

15%
45%
0%
0%
Neutral
15

Elasticsearch

13%
40%
0%
0%
Neutral
16

OpenSearch

12%
35%
0%
0%
Neutral
17

Jaeger

12%
35%
0%
0%
Neutral
18

Zipkin

12%
35%
0%
0%
Neutral
19

Kubernetes

12%
35%
0%
0%
Neutral
20

Docker

12%
35%
0%
0%
Neutral
Domain
Title
LLM
URL
droomdroom.com
Gemini
botpress.com
Gemini
thenewstack.io
Gemini
codewave.com
Gemini
aalpha.net
Gemini
wowlabz.com
Gemini
medium.com
Gemini
safe.com
Gemini
orq.ai
Gemini
leanware.co
Gemini
kanerika.com
Gemini
lindy.ai
Gemini
openai.com
Gemini
moveworks.com
Gemini
getstream.io
Gemini
lindy.ai
Perplexity
oracle.com
Perplexity
servicenow.com
Perplexity
youtube.com
Perplexity
google.com
Perplexity
vercel.com
Perplexity
salesforce.com
Perplexity
huggingface.co
Perplexity
Logo© 2025 BrandRadar. All Rights Reserved.