The analysis on this page is derived from AI platform responses, providing a detailed view of brand visibility and positioning

implementing PayID and PayTo for instant payments

Prompt

Last updated 18th September 2025

Domain count
auspayplus.com.au
2
nab.com.au
1
anz.com.au
1
Citations count
34
0
25
9
Brands Discovered
7
3
3
4

Original answer

Below is a practical, end-to-end guide you can follow to implement PayID and PayTo support instant payments. It covers architecture, discovery, API endpoints, security, message flows, error handling, reconciliation, testing, and deployment notes — with sample payloads and pseudocode you can adapt to your stack.

Summary (quick)

  • PayID: an identifier-to-address discovery layer (human-friendly identifier mapped to payment addresses). Implement by hosting PayID endpoints that return payment addresses for a given PayID; support HTTPS, well-known paths, JSON responses, and CORS if used from browsers.
  • PayTo: a mandate / instruction model for push payments (tokenized or signed payment instructions that a payer’s bank can use to initiate a push). Implement by accepting, validating, and storing PayTo mandates/instructions and exposing APIs for initiation, lifecycle events, and webhook notifications.
  • Integration: implement discovery (look up PayID → endpoint), validate signatures & authorization on PayTo data, initiate instant payment through your instant rails (RTP, Faster Payments, NPP, ACH push rails, or an API to your bank/processor), and handle settlement, returns and reconciliation.

Important: The implementation details (URIs, exact JSON fields, any regulatory behaviors) vary by region and standard version. Treat the notes below as a complete, implementation-ready blueprint — adapt specifics to the PayID/PayTo specification version and the instant-pay rail you will actually use.

  1. High-level architecture
  • API layer: REST or REST+JSON endpoints for:
    • PayID lookup (discovery)
    • Creating/validating PayTo instructions / mandates
    • Payment initiation (create payment)
    • Webhooks / events (payment updates, confirmations, returns)
    • Admin and reconciliation endpoints
  • Persistence: durable store for PayTo mandates & payment attempts (DB + audit log)
  • Security: TLS (mutual TLS where required), JWT/OAuth2 for API auth, signature verification for payloads, HSM for key management
  • Messaging: queue (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka) to decouple inbound API traffic from payment-rail requests
  • Integration adapters: connectors to instant rails / PSPs (RTP, NPP, SEPA Instant, Faster Payments, etc.) or bank APIs
  • Monitoring & alerting: latency, failures, compliance events
  • Testing infra: sandbox endpoints, test data, replayable test vectors
  1. PayID: implementation details & sample flows Purpose: resolve a human-readable identifier (e.g., alice$example.com or [email protected]) to one or many payment addresses (XRPL address, IBAN, BSB/Account, mobile number, crypto address, etc.).

Core behaviors to implement:

  • Standard PayID discovery is HTTP-based. For a PayID identifier you need to:
    1. Parse the PayID (local-part and host). Example formats include: alice$example.com or [email protected] depending on flavor.
    2. Do an HTTPS request to the host’s PayID endpoint to ask for payment addresses. Example endpoint pattern: https://{host}/.well-known/PayID/{encoded-PayID} (confirm exact spec you follow).
    3. Respect Accept header(s) for content negotiation (application/PayID+json, etc.)
    4. Return a JSON response mapping payment network/protocol types to addresses.
    5. Cache results sensibly with TTL from cache-control headers.

What to host on your domain (server-side):

  • A TLS-enabled endpoint that can respond to PayID discovery queries for PayIDs hosted by your domain. The endpoint returns structured JSON listing available address types and optional metadata (name, verified status).
  • Example response (pseudocode JSON): { "PayID": "alice$yourdomain.com", "addresses": [ { "paymentNetwork": "ACH", "environment": "SANDBOX", "addressDetailsType": "IBAN", "addressDetails": { "iban": "GB33BUKB20201555555555" } }, { "paymentNetwork": "XRPL", "environment": "MAINNET", "addressDetailsType": "CryptoAddress", "addressDetails": { "address": "rPT1Sjq2YGrBMTttX4GZHjKu9dyfzbpAYe" } } ] }
  • Include cache-control header and optional signature/metadata if the spec expects it.

Server-side implementation checklist:

  • HTTPS certificate (public CA; strong TLS config).
  • Implement path encoding for special chars in PayIDs.
  • Implement content negotiation and return the appropriate media type(s).
  • Rate-limiting to avoid abuse.
  • Logging and audit trail for lookups.
  • Optionally sign the JSON response if the ecosystem expects signed discovery payloads.

Client-side (resolving a PayID):

  • Accept a PayID from user input (validate format).
  • Extract host & local-part.
  • Query the PayID endpoint over HTTPS (use Accept header).
  • Validate TLS certificate; verify hostname; optionally enforce certificate pinning.
  • Parse response and pick appropriate address for the payment rail you’ll use (e.g., pick IBAN for SEPA, pick domestic account for FPS).
  • Handle multiple addresses and confirm choice with payer or business rules.
  • Cache the result per TTL; re-resolve if cached TTL expired or if payment fails with “invalid address”.
  1. PayTo: implementation details & sample flows Purpose: PayTo (generalized) is the model where a payer or payee issues a structured, signed instruction or mandate that a payer’s bank or PSP can use to make a push payment. Implementation generally requires:
  • Accepting a PayTo instruction payload (which contains payer, payee, amount, currency, reference, expiration, unique IDs, and a signature over the payload or a PKI-backed assertion).
  • Validating authenticity and integrity (signatures, certificate chains, or OAuth2 tokens).
  • Persisting a PayTo object with lifecycle states (CREATED, AUTHORIZED, SUBMITTED, SETTLED, FAILED, CANCELLED).
  • Exposing APIs to authorize, revoke, or query status.
  • Mapping PayTo to specific rail initiation messages and sending them.

Core PayTo fields (typical, adapt to spec):

  • payToId (unique)
  • payee (PayID or account details)
  • payer (PayID or payer account reference)
  • amount, currency
  • scheduledAt (optional)
  • expiry
  • remitInfo / reference
  • signature / authorization token / authorization method
  • processing instructions (priority, fees, metadata)

Example PayTo JSON pseudocode: { "payToId": "pt-1234567890", "payee": { "PayID": "merchant$shop.com" }, "payer": { "PayID": "alice$bank.com" }, "amount": { "value": "150.00", "currency": "USD" }, "createdAt": "2025-09-18T13:12:00Z", "expiresAt": "2025-09-18T13:22:00Z", "remittance": "Invoice 2025-0918", "signature": { "type": "JWS", "protected": "...", "signature": "..." } }

PayTo lifecyle actions:

  • CREATE (payer or payee issues PayTo)
  • AUTHORIZE (payer approves — maybe via SCA or bank channel)
  • SUBMIT (PSP or payer bank submits to payment rail)
  • SETTLE or FAIL
  • REVOKE/CANCEL

How to implement PayTo flows:

  • Submission flow (payer-initiated push):

    1. Payer authenticates to your app (verify identity, SCA).
    2. Create a PayTo instruction (either payer creates it or payee provides a PayTo request that payer accepts).
    3. Validate PayTo: check signatures, verify PayIDs involved by resolving PayIDs, ensure sufficient authorizations, check anti-fraud & limit rules.
    4. Translate PayTo into the instant-rail specific message (rail adapter). For example, create RTP or NPP payment message with required fields.
    5. Submit to rail via connector. Record hit state and message id from rail.
    6. Wait for synchronous confirmation (if rail supports immediate success) or handle asynchronous webhooks for settlement.
    7. Update PayTo state and notify parties (webhooks / callbacks to merchant or client).
  • Mandate-based recurring or push-from-payee:

    • Accept and validate payee-originated instruction with payer consent (SCA or pre-authorization).
    • Store mandate with expiry and scope.
    • When instructed, create payment using the stored mandate and sign/authorize as required.

Security & authorization

  • TLS is mandatory for all endpoints.
  • API auth: OAuth2 (client_credentials or JWT) for machine-to-machine; OAuth2 + userConsent for payer actions.
  • Payload integrity: require signed payloads (JWS/JWT) for PayTo instruction; verify signature and certificate chain.
  • Key management: use HSM for private keys; rotate keys periodically; publish public keys if required for signature verification.
  • SCA: support multi-factor authentication for payer authorization when required (SMS OTP, push notifications, FIDO2, OAuth consent).
  • Rate limiting, IP allowlists, WAF to mitigate abuse.
  • Logging: keep immutable logs/audit for all instructions and state changes for compliance and dispute resolution.
  1. Mapping PayID + PayTo to instant rails
  • Discovery: resolve payee PayID to determine account/address and ledger/rail to use (domestic account, IBAN, mobile proxy).
  • Payment format: map the generic PayTo fields to the target rail’s fields (e.g., for ISO20022-based rails: PartyIdentification, InstructedAmount, EndToEndId).
  • Fees and routing: determine who pays fees (payer or payee) and include appropriate fields in the payment message.
  • Handling synchronous vs asynchronous confirmation: some rails return immediate success; others are eventual — support both.
  1. API Endpoints — example contract
  • POST /PayID/resolve
    • Request: { "PayID": "alice$example.com", "preferredNetwork": "ACH" }
    • Response: addresses array (as per PayID spec)
  • POST /PayTo (create a PayTo)
    • Request: PayTo JSON payload with signature
    • Response: { "payToId": "pt-...", "status": "CREATED" }
  • POST /PayTo/{id}/authorize
    • Request: authorization evidence (payer SCA token or signature)
    • Response: updated status (AUTHORIZED)
  • POST /payments (initiate payment)
    • Request: { "payToId": "...", "initiator": "payer", "clientTraceId": "..." }
    • Response: { "paymentId":"p-123", "status":"SUBMITTED", "railMessageId":"..." }
  • GET /payments/{id} (status)
  • Webhook: POST /webhooks/payments (events: SUBMITTED, SETTLED, FAILED, RETURNED)
  1. Error handling and edge cases
  • PayID not found: return 404 and user-friendly error. Consider fallback (ask payer to input raw account details).
  • Address mismatch: if PayID resolves to an address that doesn’t match PayTo payee, flag for manual review.
  • Expired PayTo: don’t submit expired instructions; return EXPIRED.
  • Duplicate payment attempts: detect by clientTraceId or payToId; reject duplicates.
  • Partial settlement & returns: handle messages from rails indicating partial funds or returns and update PayTo/payments accordingly.
  • Refunds: provide endpoints to initiate refunds (reverse push or instruct bank).
  1. Reconciliation & reporting
  • Persist rail message IDs and timestamps; link to PayTo and your internal invoices.
  • Periodic reconciliation: match settlement reports from rails/banks to submitted payments (amount, endToEndId).
  • Handle adjustments, fees, reversals in your ledger and notify accounting systems.
  1. Testing & sandbox
  • Have sandbox endpoints for PayID discovery and PayTo flows. Use test keys, test PayIDs, and mock rails.
  • Test cases: success path, signature invalid, expired instruction, insufficient funds, duplicate detection, partial settlement.
  • Security testing: pentest, penetration testing, OWASP top-10 checks, rate-limit abuse tests.
  1. Operational & compliance considerations
  • KYC/AML: ensure payers/payees meet required KYC depending on amounts and jurisdictions.
  • Data retention & privacy: store minimal personal data and follow local regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).
  • Dispute management: implement API/web UI to surface disputes and evidence (signed PayTo payloads).
  • SLAs & SLIs: define success rates and latencies for instant payments; monitor in production.
  • Key rotation and incident response plan for compromised keys.
  1. Example pseudocode (very small)
  • Resolve PayID (client): function resolvePayId(PayID): host = extractHost(PayID) path = "/.well-known/PayID/" + urlEncode(PayID) resp = httpsGET("https://" + host + path, headers={"Accept":"application/PayID+json"}) if resp.status == 200: return parseJson(resp.body) else: throw "PayID Not Found"

  • Create PayTo (server): function createPayTo(payload, jws): if not verifyJWS(payload, jws, getPublicKey(payload.signer)): throw "Invalid signature" if payload.expiresAt < now(): throw "Expired" resolve payeeAddr = resolvePayId(payload.payee.PayID) store PayTo in DB with state CREATED return {payToId: id, status: CREATED}

  • Submit payment to rail: function submitPayment(payToId): pt = db.get(payToId) if pt.state != "AUTHORIZED": throw "Not authorized" railMsg = mapToRailMessage(pt) result = railConnector.submit(railMsg) db.update(pt.id, {state: "SUBMITTED", railId: result.railMessageId}) return result

  1. Deployment checklist
  • TLS certs; HSTS
  • Endpoint rate limiting & monitoring
  • API keys & OAuth clients for partners
  • HSM for signing keys
  • Logging, audit & SIEM integration
  • On-call rotation & runbooks
  1. QA & rollout
  • Start with sandbox partners and a small pilot set of merchants/payers.
  • Monitor transaction success/latency and disputes.
  • Iterate on caching rules for PayID resolution and error handling.
  • Expand to production after compliance checks and operational readiness.

If you want, I can:

  • Produce concrete OpenAPI (Swagger) definitions for the endpoints above.
  • Generate sample JWS/JWT signing and verification code in a language you use (Node.js, Java, Python, Go).
  • Produce pay-rail mapping templates (example ISO20022 pain.001 and pacs.008 templates) for a specific instant rail (tell me which rail or country).
  • Draft DB schema and example SQL for storing PayTo and payment state.

Tell me which of those you want next (e.g., OpenAPI, sample code in Node.js, or ISO20022 mapping for RTP/NPP/SEPA).

Join BrandRadar to track your LLM score

Stay ahead of the curve. Get insights, benchmarks, and personalized alerts on your brand's LLM performance.

Rank
Brand
Topic
LLM
Sentiment
1
🥇

PayID

67%
0%
100%
100%
Neutral
2
🥈

PayTo

63%
0%
95%
95%
Neutral
3
🥉

New Payments Platform

60%
0%
90%
90%
Neutral
4

XRPL

28%
85%
0%
0%
Neutral
5

RabbitMQ

27%
80%
0%
0%
Neutral
6

Kafka

25%
75%
0%
0%
Neutral
7

AUSTRAC

23%
0%
70%
0%
Neutral
Domain
Title
LLM
URL
auspayplus.com.au
Gemini
nab.com.au
Gemini
anz.com.au
Gemini
remitfinder.com
Gemini
finder.com.au
Gemini
esafety.gov.au
Gemini
anz.com
Gemini
paychoice.com.au
Gemini
azupay.com.au
Gemini
stripe.com
Gemini
gocardless.com
Gemini
digitaloneagency.com.au
Gemini
helloclever.co
Gemini
worldpayforplatforms.com
Gemini
treasury.gov.au
Gemini
cys.com.sg
Gemini
zdnet.com
Gemini
wikipedia.org
Gemini
tookitaki.com
Gemini
commbank.com.au
Gemini
hellozai.com
Gemini
qudosbank.com.au
Gemini
duckcreek.com
Gemini
westpac.com.au
Gemini
volt.io
Gemini
digitaloneagency.com.au
Perplexity
peopleschoice.com.au
Perplexity
gocardless.com
Perplexity
auspayplus.com.au
Perplexity
artipi.com.au
Perplexity
Logo© 2025 BrandRadar. All Rights Reserved.