The analysis on this page is derived from AI platform responses, providing a detailed view of brand visibility and positioning

What are the best colocation facilities in Amsterdam

Prompt

Last updated 29th October 2025

Domain count
equinix.com
1
prnewswire.com
1
ironmountain.com
1
Citations count
25
7
8
10
Brands Discovered
27
14
14
11

Original answer

Here are the top colocation facilities and operators in the Amsterdam market (why they’re notable and what they’re best for). I’ve focused on network-dense, carrier‑neutral sites and large campus operators that customers commonly pick for low latency to Europe, scale, compliance and interconnection.

  1. Equinix (AM1 / AM2 / AM3 / AM4 / AM5 / AM6 / AM7 / AM8 / AM11)
  • Why: Industry-leading interconnection ecosystem, many metro sites at Science Park and Westpoort, direct access to AMS‑IX and many cloud providers, extensive carrier community and strong sustainability/certifications. Good for enterprises and multi‑cloud/low‑latency use cases. (Equinix.com)
  1. Digital Realty / Interxion (Amsterdam Data Tower and Science Park sites)
  • Why: Large carrier‑neutral footprint in Science Park (Digital Realty’s PlatformDIGITAL/Interxion assets), strong connectivity to AMS‑IX, good for enterprises and hyperscalers needing dense peering and multi‑floor deployments. (prnewswire.com)
  1. Iron Mountain (Amsterdam campus, AMS‑1)
  • Why: Very large campus near Haarlem/Schiphol with hyperscale capacity, strong compliance posture (ISO, SOC, PCI etc.), 100% matched renewable power options and a big carrier ecosystem — good for regulated industries and large-scale builds. (ironmountain.com)
  1. Global Switch (Amsterdam Data Centre Campus)
  • Why: Large scalable campus in Slotervaart/Overtoomseveld, high carrier density and direct access to AMS‑IX/NL‑IX; suitable for bespoke multi‑MW requirements and customers wanting campus-level scale. (globalswitch.com)
  1. NTT / e‑shelter (AMS1 campus)
  • Why: Major European operator (e‑shelter / NTT) with a Schiphol‑Rijk campus offering wholesale + retail colo, large power capacity and carrier options — good if you want a single operator with global reach and hybrid cloud options. (services.global.ntt)
  1. EvoSwitch (AMS‑01 / Haarlem)
  • Why: Energy‑efficient, green‑focused operator with a large modular facility near Schiphol (carrier options and adiabatic cooling). Often chosen for green credentials and flexibility. (evoswitch.com)
  1. EdgeConneX, Keppel/CloudHQ and other campus players
  • Why: Several other operators (EdgeConneX, CloudHQ/Keppel and smaller regional colo providers) have developed AMS campuses near Schiphol and Science Park recently; choose these for specific wholesale or edge requirements or when you need space/power that larger retail sites may not have. (examples and footprints vary by campus). (baxtel.com)

How to choose between them (quick checklist)

  • Connectivity & peering: check presence of AMS‑IX, NL‑IX and the carrier list at the specific site.
  • Latency/Location: Science Park is the typical low‑latency hub for EU traffic; Schiphol area has many hyperscale campuses.
  • Power & density: verify per‑rack kW and campus expansion plans if you expect growth.
  • Compliance & certifications: ISO 27001, SOC, PCI, and local/regulatory requirements matter for finance/health customers.
  • Sustainability: if renewable energy or low PUE matters, confirm the operator’s energy mix and PUE claims.
  • Commercial model: retail vs wholesale, contract length, cross‑connect fees, and Smart‑Hands rates.
  • Physical access & remote services: 24/7 access policy, courier access, and on‑site engineering support.

If you’d like, I can:

  • Compare 2–3 specific facilities side‑by‑side (power per rack, pricing indicators, carrier list, certifications) — I’ll look up current availability and recent pricing/quotes. (Note: for current availability or exact pricing I’ll fetch live info.)
  • Or search specifically for carrier lists or certifications for any one of the facilities above.

Which comparison would you like me to run next?

Join BrandRadar to track your LLM score

Stay ahead of the curve. Get insights, benchmarks, and personalized alerts on your brand's LLM performance.

Rank
Brand
Topic
LLM
Sentiment
1
🥇

Equinix

88%
85%
100%
80%
Neutral
2
🥈

Digital Realty

75%
80%
95%
50%
Neutral
3
🥉

AMS-IX

57%
35%
65%
70%
Neutral
4

Interxion

55%
75%
90%
0%
Neutral
5

phoenixNAP

55%
0%
70%
95%
Neutral
6

NL-IX

52%
35%
60%
60%
Neutral
7

Iron Mountain

50%
70%
80%
0%
Neutral
8

IXroom

33%
0%
45%
55%
Neutral
9

MIRhosting

30%
0%
0%
90%
Neutral
10

True

28%
0%
0%
85%
Neutral
11

DC1.AMSTERDAM

27%
0%
0%
80%
Neutral
12

NorthC Datacenters

25%
0%
75%
0%
Neutral
13

SpectraIP

23%
0%
0%
70%
Neutral
14

Global Switch

22%
65%
0%
0%
Neutral
15

HOSTKEY

22%
0%
65%
0%
Neutral
Domain
Title
LLM
URL
Amsterdam Data Centers | Premium Colocation Provider and Internet Exchange Point by Equinix
Openai
Interxion: A Digital Realty Company Expands Coverage and Capacity of PlatformDIGITAL® in Amsterdam
Openai
Amsterdam Data Center | Amsterdam Colocation | Iron Mountain United States
Openai
Amsterdam Data Centre Campus | Global Switch
Openai
Amsterdam 1 Data Center | NTT
Openai
Amsterdam Data Center (AMS-01) - Evoswitch Evoswitch
Openai
NTT Amsterdam 1 Data Center
Openai
rebootmonkey.com
Gemini
quotecolo.com
Gemini
phoenixnap.com
Gemini
mirhosting.com
Gemini
true.nl
Gemini
dc1.amsterdam
Gemini
spectraip.net
Gemini
datacentermap.com
Perplexity
digitalrealty.com
Perplexity
baxtel.com
Perplexity
datacenters.com
Perplexity
hostkey.com
Perplexity
datacentremagazine.com
Perplexity
Logo© 2025 BrandRadar. All Rights Reserved.